The second estimate of Real GDP revised US growth upward to 2.9% for the third quarter of 2022. The first estimate had come in at 2.6%. Although personal consumption was revised up in this release, net exports remain the primary driver of the current GDP results. Personal consumption (+1.7%) has been positive, but not strong enough to sustain robust growth in the overall economy. Personal consumption is the most important driver of domestic growth. Personal spending on goods was down slightly; spending on services was up 2.7%. Residential investment was down 26.8%. Government spending was up 3.0%, driven primarily by defense spending at the Federal level. The core PCE deflator, one of the Fed’s most closely watched inflation measures, was up 4.6%. Although inflation is showing signs of decelerating, it remains too hot for the Fed’s liking.
We continue to see evidence that the post-COVID problems in the supply chain are healing. Shipping container costs have declined by two-thirds this year, after increasing ten-fold in 2021. The cost of moving a container from China to the US West Coast has declined over 80% since April, however it still remains significantly higher than in 2019. Port congestion is easing. Globally, only 8% of vessels are being delayed at ports, compared to 14% at the beginning of the year. That number would have to trend down to 3% to match pre-pandemic transportation efficiency. China continues to experience periodic shutdowns due to COVID, and China is the critical supplier of parts and goods to the world. As China reopens, supply problems should resolve. However, a more productive China will also put upward pressure on commodity prices. Recent declines in commodity prices have been a bright spot in the inflation picture.
Investors and business leaders should remain on recession watch for 2023, and that is the consensus view of most analysts. Right now, employment and consumer spending are strong enough to carry us through without recession, but employment is decelerating, and consumers are spending down a strong reservoir of savings at a pace that would not appear sustainable. The Fed remains tightly focused on inflation and has already applied a dose of medicine that may prove to be a good bit stronger than is presently apparent. This year’s rate increases have been unusually fast and steep, and as Raphael Bostic, President of the Atlanta Fed, has recently reminded us, it can take 18 months to two years or more for tight monetary policy to materially impact inflation. When such lags follow steep and sudden rate increases, it is easy for the Fed to get ahead of itself. It is possible to describe a scenario where monetary tightening impacts inflation without triggering a recession, but the probabilities are low. Typically, monetary tightening operates by dampening demand, which in turn slows down the economy—resulting in lower inflation.
Furthermore, we must keep in mind that higher rates are not the only measure that the Fed has taken to combat inflation. The Fed is also reducing the money supply by $95 billion every month through “quantitative tightening”. Quantitative tightening is the reverse of “quantitative easing” and is the process of reducing the vast portfolio of bonds the Fed holds on its balance sheet in an effort to mop up excess cash in the financial system. Quantitative easing involves creating new money to purchase bonds in the open market. It has the effect of flooding the financial system with new money. The Fed used quantitative easing to stimulate the economy in the aftermath of the Financial Crisis and during COVID. Quantitative tightening is the opposite process of reducing the portfolio of bonds held by the Fed and draining excess money from the economy. Because quantitative tightening is a tool that the Fed has not used extensively in the past, its impact on the economy and on inflation is less well understood by both policymakers and analysts. However, economists at the San Francisco Fed have recently estimated that quantitative tightening may have the same effect as adding 2% to the Fed Funds target rate, if rates were the only tool used to combat inflation. Imagine that we are heading into 2023 with short-term rates already at an effective 6%, instead of the 4% markets are currently anticipating.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, fred.stlouisfed.org